EnergySolutions confident on waste deal despite new Senate bill
by Doug Radunich
Jul 03, 2008 | 1725 views | 2 2 comments | 16 16 recommendations | email to a friend | print
A bill scheduled to be introduced in the U.S. Senate next week would forbid foreign-generated nuclear waste from being accepted by American disposal facilities. If passed, the bill would derail EnergySolutions’ bid to take Italian nuclear waste at its Clive facility.

The new bill, which is being introduced by Benjamin Cardin, D-Md., and Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn., would generally ban all waste generated in foreign countries from being imported to the United States. EnergySolutions spokesman John Ward said the new bill is somewhat similar to a bill that was proposed in the House of Representatives in March by Rep. Jim Matheson, D-Utah, as well as fellow House Energy and Commerce Committee members Reps. Bart Gordon, D-Tenn., and Ed Whitfield, R-Ky.

“Matheson’s bill was introduced in March and had its subcommittee hearing in May, but there was no action taken on it,” Ward said. “Right now it’s just a bill that’s been filed with several other bills, and it’s not actively moving along at the moment.”

Ward doesn’t think this new bill will even reach the floor of the senate.

“I think the chances of it passing are slim, just because of everything Congress is dealing with right now,” he said. “They’re dealing with issues like energy policies, $4-a-gallon gasoline, health care, and budgets that need to be approved, so the issue of whether or not to overturn the NRC’s (Nuclear Regulatory Commission) regulatory authority on this is a bit of a stretch. There are more important things Congress has to worry about, and I see no sign that this bill or the one introduced by Matheson will make it to the floor.”

However, Jessica Kendrick, field organizer for HEAL Utah (Healthy Environment Alliance of Utah), said she fully supports the new bill and sees it passing because of its connection to Matheson’s previously introduced bill.

“This Senate bill is identical to the one introduced by Rep. Matheson, and having two parallel bills — both a House bill and Senate bill — increases the chances of this one passing,” Kendrick said. “It also legitimizes the bill and helps it garner more support from the public.”

EnergySolutions applied last fall for a license from the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission to import 20,000 tons of Class-A waste from Italy. The majority of the waste would be processed at the company’s processing facility in Bear Creek, Tenn., with up to 6,000 tons of it being disposed at the Clive facility.

More than 2,000 Utah citizens have objected to the NRC about the import license.

Ward said the Italian waste project would take place over a five-year period, and that EnergySolutions’ license application for the project is still pending with the NRC. However, he is confident the application will be approved.

“The NRC has a number of health and safety concerns they need to oversee for issuing permits, and if they follow those guidelines, we’re confident that they’ll approve us,” Ward said.

Ward said the Italian waste project is necessary in an age of globalization.

“If the concern of the people is that they want to do the best thing for the environment, this bill is the wrong direction to go,” he said. “We live in an interconnected world, and we’re doing what we feel is the best practice for dealing with important issues for the planet. We also feel that by doing this project it will further the work we’re doing all over Europe, and get people interested in building facilities similar to the one in Clive over there.”

dougrad@tooeletranscript.com
Comments
(2)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
stirthepot
|
July 07, 2008
Ghostmale, Do you know how much waste will end up in Tooele? What kind of waste? How will it be processed first? Just living in Utah you should be used to having things pawned off on you.

GhostMale
|
July 03, 2008
I may be ignorant on this subject, but it just seems to me a silly idea to bring another country's waste product here. I think that if they are going to use nuclear reactors for their own needs, then they need to deal with the repurcussions of that decision: namely, to deal with the waste disposal and not pawn it off to someone else.
report abuse...

Comments will be posted after review. Please allow up to 24 hours for comment approval.

Readers are solely responsible for the content of the comments they post here. Comments do not necessarily reflect the opinion or approval of the Tooele Transcript-Bulletin. Abusive comments and users are subject to rejection or removal without notification.

We will reject and remove comments that contain any of the following: Potentially libelous statements; personal attacks, insults or threats; profanity or obscene references; copyrighted articles or information used without permission; promotional messages of a commercial nature; links to other Web sites; comments unrelated to the topic of the article.

By posting a comment, you are agreeing to abide by these guidelines. Violation of these guidelines may result in a user being barred from posting on the Web site.

Online Edition
Shadowbox Test Site

THIS WEEK'S ADS

QUALITY AUTOMOTIVE
To Flash Zoom Click HERE
Click HERE to visit our website



RITZ THEATRES
To Flash Zoom Click HERE



QUALITY AUTOMOTIVE
To Flash Zoom Click HERE
Click HERE to visit our website



DAVID K. PALMER
To Flash Zoom Click HERE



BIG O TIRES
To Flash Zoom Click HERE
Click HERE to visit our website



AMERICAN BURGERS
To Flash Zoom Click HERE
Click HERE to visit our website



MOUNTAIN WEST MEDICAL CENTER
To Flash Zoom Click HERE
Click HERE to visit our website



TRANSCRIPT BULLETIN PUBLISHING
To Flash Zoom Click HERE
Click HERE to visit our website