Opposition to power line route amping up
by Sarah Miley
Jun 18, 2009 | 2780 views | 8 8 comments | 47 47 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Maxine Grimm points across a field in front of her Tooele home on Thursday morning showing where Rocky Mountain Power may build a new transmission line. Several Tooele residents have bonded together to oppose a route along the east bench of the Oquirrhs.<br>- photography / Maegan Burr
Maxine Grimm points across a field in front of her Tooele home on Thursday morning showing where Rocky Mountain Power may build a new transmission line. Several Tooele residents have bonded together to oppose a route along the east bench of the Oquirrhs.
- photography / Maegan Burr
slideshow
Residents say towers along east bench of the Oquirrhs would blight views, endanger urban areas

Maxine Grimm has lived in the foothills of Tooele, near the mouth of Middle Canyon, for nearly 60 years. She loves her views across the valley, the greenery of the undeveloped hillsides, and the wildlife that passes through her property.

But Grimm, 95, is worried she’ll lose all that if Rocky Mountain Power’s proposed Mona-to-Oquirrh transmission line passes along the east side of Tooele Valley.

“I’m really concerned because they might be putting it through my property,” she said. “This is such a beautiful valley and the scenery is so wonderful, and you put those enormous poles and wires in — it would detract totally from all the rest. Not only that but they make a lot of noise and there can be dangers from the tremendous amount of electricity that’s in those wires.”

Grimm is only one of a growing number of Tooele residents who are concerned about the power project passing along the Oquirrhs’ east bench.

Randy Christensen, of Tooele, said a group opposing the east-bench route was formed after a few residents attended a Rocky Mountain Power meeting about the project.

“We just started making phone calls, asking people if they were willing to help and serve on this committee to fight this,” he said.

A meeting held at Brad and Kaye Pratt’s home on Deer Hollow Road in Tooele brought out more than 50 people and lasted well into the morning hours. The group has expanded rapidly since, Christensen said.

“We had 54 at the initial meeting, but it’s hard to say how many there are now because it’s growing,” Christensen said. “It’s like wildfire.”

Christensen said if the line has to come through Tooele Valley, they’d prefer it not damage any pristine mountain or foothills along the city’s bench.

The group is planning on doing a mass distribution of fliers door-to-door this weekend. In addition, the group has been circulating a petition against routes through the southeast mountainside of the Tooele Valley — a petition that currently has at least 1,000 signatures, according to Brad Pratt.

The 500/345kV transmission line would run from Mona in Juab County to a proposed Limber Substation to be built in the Tooele Valley. From there, two separate lines are proposed to run from the proposed 500/345/138kV Limber Substation to the existing Oquirrh Substation in West Jordan and the existing Terminal Substation in Salt Lake City.

According to the draft EIS, the line would initially be 345kV voltage starting from the Mona Substation, but in the future it would be upgraded to 500kV as necessary. A 345kV steel structure can range from 125 to 150 feet high, with a right of way of 150 feet. A 500kV steel structure can range from 170 to 200 feet with a right of way of 300 feet.

The Bureau of Land Management has released a draft environmental impact statement on the project that includes Rocky Mountain Power’s proposed routes, the BLM’s preferred routes, and other alternative routes.

Residents opposing power lines on Tooele’s east bench are concerned about routes from the Limber Substation, which has been proposed to be built on the west side of Mormon Trail Road about 1 mile southwest of the Tooele Army Depot, to the Oquirrh Substation. There are six possible routes for this portion of the line, including Rocky Mountain Power’s proposed route and the BLM’s preferred route.

Martie Leo, customer and community manager for Rocky Mountain Power, said at this point none of the routes have been finalized.

“We’re still in the comment period and people need to make sure we’re aware of their concerns,” she said. “We’re still looking at everything.”

Christensen said the opposition group is opposed to routes that essentially travel from SR-36 near Settlement Canyon eastward.

“Everybody’s interested and concerned and opposed to the route that Rocky Mountain Power has proposed to take this transmission corridor through,” said Kaye Pratt. “We agree we need power, but it doesn’t need to go where it’s populated, developed, and in an established community. It needs to go on the outskirts. We have plenty of barren land.”

Christensen said the group would prefer an alternative route that after leaving the Limber Substation and along South Mountain, extends northeast, crossing SR-36 north of Tooele City and travels east of Stansbury Park before rounding the north point of the Oquirrhs.

Kaye said the foothills of Tooele aren’t a fit area for power lines.

“These are the only foothills left without any mining or destruction,” she said. “They should be preserved for open space, wildlife and the view.”

Christensen, whose family owns more than 400 acres in Corner Canyon, said his property could be directly impacted.

“I’m not opposed to the project itself, just this route which goes through our foothills,” he said, adding he understands the need for power. “It seems like it’s one of the few areas of our valley, of our county really, that has not been affected by mine tailings, lots of roads, lots of power poles. It’s very pristine up there. It’s one of the few jewels that we have left as citizens of Tooele.”

Some residents have expressed concerns about toppled lines causing wildfires so near an urban area. Others worry about the line obscuring and cutting off access to Tooele High School’s “T.”

Tooele City Mayor Patrick Dunlavy said because no decision has been made as to the route of the proposed transmission line, the city does not have a position on the project at this point.

“We’re going to let [concerned citizens] come in the first city council meeting in July and we’ll also have Rocky Mountain Power there so they can answer questions,” Dunlavy said.

Tooele County Commissioner Colleen Johnson believes the project would be beneficial in terms of getting more power to the valley for economic development. She added she has heard there are residents concerned about the towers and lines going across property, and concerned about areas near the Mormon Trail Road and near the new USU expansion, in addition to the southeast side of Tooele in the foothills.

“Hopefully they’ll work with us and hopefully be able to move it in some different spots where it won’t impact as many people,” Johnson said, adding the project will benefit the valley overall. “I think there’s some misunderstanding that all this power is going to Salt Lake. A lot of it is for Tooele County.”

Rocky Mountain Power’s Leo said community input will be a factor when considered when finalizing routes.

The BLM will be holding a public meeting about the project June 23 from 5 p.m. to 8 p.m. at the Tooele County building.

The public comment period on the draft EIS is ongoing until Aug. 12. Submit comments via the following: E-mail at UT_M2OTL_EIS@blm.gov, fax to 801-977-4397 or 435-743-3135, or mail to Mike Nelson, BLM Salt Lake Field Office, 2370 South 2300 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84119 or Clara Stevens, BLM Fillmore Field Office, 35 East 500 North, Fillmore, UT 84631. For more information, visit http://www.blm.gov/ut/st/en/fo/salt_lake/planning/mona_to_oquirrh_transmission.html.

Sarah Miley: swest@tooeletranscript.com

comments (8)
« hanso1 wrote on Wednesday, Jul 08 at 09:05 AM »
. If the lines must travel thru Tooele Valley then the only acceptable route travels along the west side of the valley to I-80 and then to Lakepoint. RMP argues that both lines can not run down that route but you can find numerous examples of multiple lines running in the same corridor all over the state.

The East bench route has many flaws to include the following:

-Negative impact on the Biological Resources in this area which include a large community of wildlife. This area is pristine and untouched and needs to stay that way for the good of all the wildlife in the area. There are two natural springs that provide water for livestock and all wildlife in the Corner Canyon area and if they are impacted by this project it will destroy the wildlife in this area.

-Negative impact on the Visual Resource / sensitive viewing area that all of the Tooele Valley enjoys. This includes the area below that “T” that will be impacted by these lines.

-Negative impact on the Earth Resources by creating a 150’ to 300’ area that will be grubbed and cleared of all natural vegetation and promote erosion in the area. Tooele City engineers already have landslide and erosion concerns in the existing east bench subdivisions and this can only make the situation worse.

-Greatly increased risk of fire in a densely wooded area that is not easily accessed by the Tooele County / City volunteer fire department.

-Negative impact to property values on any residential or business property located near these lines.

- Negative impact on health due to the proven impact of “stray power” from high voltage lines upon human beings.

These are just a few of the many reasons that the East Bench specifically and Tooele City routes in general are a BAD idea. We are tired of everyone abusing Tooele, we have MagCorp, we have the nerve agent, we have Dugway, we have the west desert hazardous waste companies, we do more than our fair share of the dirty work.
« dts36 wrote on Wednesday, Jun 24 at 10:48 PM »
The last two responses are pathetic. Ignorant or apathetic views such as these are useless. Surely those interested in preserving our land will remember. Regardless, the point is simple; preserve our land for generations to come or save a few bucks and ruin our land because of a "short cut." Tooele is thier version of the path of least resistance. Do you like being walked on and taken advantage of. Come on Tooele show some fortitude and contact your city officials urging that a new route. Utilizing desert waste land makes more sense, instead of the scenic backdrop of the T and of corner canyon that we all enjoy.
« dts36 wrote on Wednesday, Jun 24 at 10:33 PM »
Those who are interested in preserving our county will surely remeber. I guess if your indifferent, apathetic or just plain pathetic like your comment was then you might not remember. Come on Tooele, stand up and fight to preserve your land. There is plenty of desert waste land to use. Money is the only factor here and NO AMMOUNT OF R.M.P. MONEY SAVINGS WILL EVER BE WORTH THE PERMANENT IMPACT ON OUR LAND.
« Justalittlethought wrote on Wednesday, Jun 24 at 10:53 AM »
In all honesty, years down the road, who's going to remember who was responsible whether the line goes through or not?
« punish-all-criminals wrote on Tuesday, Jun 23 at 07:29 AM »
the best answer

stop the baby machine so we wont need more electric lines
« sparkyknowsbest wrote on Monday, Jun 22 at 09:23 AM »
Tooele residents need to take a play book out of the Stockton residents play book and say heck no! (Like they did on the gravel pit issue). The idea of gigantic power lines polluting the view is an unworthy legacy of any elected official. Now you know, Colleen Johnson never met a project she didn't like if it meant a potential contributor to her campaign. But the rest of the folks need to step up for once and say NO! Where can we send some cash to start funding a campaign against this nonsense, and Scott Dunn, where's the editorial speaking out against this gross atrocity? Step up! You are a lifelong resident too, stand up for your community!
« dts36 wrote on Thursday, Jun 18 at 09:36 PM »
Yutahkidd couldn't have said it better. I want to add, do our county commisioners really want this to be thier legacy? For the rest of forever do they really want everyone to remember them as the ones who allowed the destruction of the scenic backdrop that we all enjoy? WOW, what short sighted thinking. They will contend that it is better for buisness development. We as residence will NEVER receive any compensatory benefit equal to the value we are losing if we permanently scar the land. Oh by the way this power IS FOR SLC at this time and NOT for Tooele valley. I was personally at the inital meeting and when I directly asked Rocky Mtn Power when our Limber substation would be built the answer was a resounding "we don't know, for now the line is for the salt lake valley." We all appreciate and understand the need for power. Alternate routes are there as proposed by the BLM in existing utility easements and MUST be pursued or we will all FOREVER be sorry for the mess this will create. Leaders, is this the legacy you want? WE DO NOT SUPPORT YOU, DON'T EXPECT TO GET RE-ELECTED IF YOU CAN NOT STAND UP FOR YOUR COUNTY.
« Yutahkidd wrote on Thursday, Jun 18 at 08:46 PM »
Years ago Tooele County passed an ordinance that ALL new sub-divisions would require underground power. The reasons for this are obvious. It is a sheer pleasure to visit Stansbury Park and notice the absence of overhead powerlines. Sadly, the serving utility company was NOT included in that County requirement and can do anything they wish. The "gauntlet" of two powerlines on both sides of Droubay Road, north of Tooele and south of Erda Way, that were installed this past year are a horrendous visual MESS! They ruined one of the greatest views of the Great Salt Lake and should be removed. Are we caretakers of the planet or careless owners of machines and building based on electrical and mechanical systems? I thought our local leaders wanted to base economic growth, in part, on tourism. Visual pollution will not accomplish this. I can NOT think of a worse location for a high-voltage overhead transmission line than across the east bench of Tooele. This is the last "pristine" and green triangle left in our County and is for RESIDENTIAL USE, come on Tooele City, STEP UP, grow a pair and stop this proposal! I moved to the bench the first time in 1961 and spent my youth there, until 1975, enjoying the sunset views (some of the best in the entire WORLD!)over the lake. The open space adjacent to the mountains and the views are incredible and second to none in an urban environment. I later bought my own house here several years ago, in part, because of these asthetics. If this powerline is built I will demand that the City be sued over the lack of enforcement of proper Zoning in this RESIDENTIAL neighborhood and Rocky Mtn. Power Co. can buy back my devalued property. Run the lines through some of our clay and sagebrush flats, NOT HERE! Are idiots really in control of the entire planet and human species???
report abuse...

Comments will be posted after review. Please allow up to 24 hours for comment approval.

Readers are solely responsible for the content of the comments they post here. Comments do not necessarily reflect the opinion or approval of the Tooele Transcript-Bulletin. Abusive comments and users are subject to rejection or removal without notification.

We will reject and remove comments that contain any of the following: Potentially libelous statements; personal attacks, insults or threats; profanity or obscene references; copyrighted articles or information used without permission; promotional messages of a commercial nature; links to other Web sites; comments unrelated to the topic of the article.

By posting a comment, you are agreeing to abide by these guidelines. Violation of these guidelines may result in a user being barred from posting on the Web site.