RMP gets (and gives) an earful
by Sarah Miley
Feb 04, 2010 | 2855 views | 2 2 comments | 34 34 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Tooele resident Ken Brodston talks about wind conditions on the benches of the Oquirrh Mountains Wednesday night at the Tooele County Planning Commission public hearing for Rocky Mountain Power’s conditional use permit on the company’s Mona-to-Oquirrh project.   <br>- photography / Maegan Burr
Tooele resident Ken Brodston talks about wind conditions on the benches of the Oquirrh Mountains Wednesday night at the Tooele County Planning Commission public hearing for Rocky Mountain Power’s conditional use permit on the company’s Mona-to-Oquirrh project.
- photography / Maegan Burr
slideshow
Rod Fisher, community relations director with Rocky Mountain Power, flips through the BLM’s draft environmental impact statement Wednesday night at the Tooele County Planning Commission meeting. <br>- photography / Maegan Burr
Rod Fisher, community relations director with Rocky Mountain Power, flips through the BLM’s draft environmental impact statement Wednesday night at the Tooele County Planning Commission meeting.
- photography / Maegan Burr
slideshow
After four-hour public meeting, county planning commission tables conditional use permit issue until next month The Tooele County Planning Commission tabled a decision last night on Rocky Mountain Power’s application for a conditional use permit for a high-voltage transmission line that would go through Tooele County. That announcement came after a more than four-hour meeting during which government officials and residents voiced opposition to the proposed route in a packed auditorium at the Tooele County Building.

The permit is being sought for the Mona-to-Oquirrh Transmission Corridor Project, which would run a transmission line from Mona in Juab County, through Tooele County and on to the Oquirrh Substation in Salt Lake County.

Planning Commissioner Bill Hogan, who made a motion to table the item until the group’s next meeting on March 3, said he thinks planning commissioners should be very thorough and clear when they make their decision. The motion to table the CUP carried with a 3-2 vote. The next meeting will include another public hearing on the issue.

Hogan referred to the situation with a gravel pit at the Stockton Bar several years ago when the county was involved in a legal battle over the issuance of a conditional use permit. The county denied the permit, but it was eventually issued after the landowner appealed. Hogan said the planning commission would need to have thorough grounds for whatever decision it reached on the RMP project.

Kerry Beutler, a Tooele County senior planner whose office advises the commission on technical issues, said, “No matter what decision they [planning commission] make, either for or against, they need to make sure that they have covered all of the bases and have good, solid reasons for acting to approve with conditions, or deny it. And that those are stated clearly so that if and when it gets appealed, then those can be clearly reviewed and looked at.”

Beutler said he and his staff and the commission still have questions about how the project will impact the area and what might be done to mitigate those impacts.

“We need to get in a position where we have specific impacts that have been identified, we have specific measures for mitigation that have been identified, and then the planning commission will determine if they think there are sufficient mitigation measures, and whether Rocky Mountain Power is willing to abide by those mitigation measures,” Beutler said.

Brad Pratt, chairman of the Tooele Concerned Citizens Group, which opposes Rocky Mountain Power’s route along the southeast benches of Tooele, said he was very encouraged by the public input at the meeting.

“I’m not discouraged by the tabling, though,” Pratt said. “This is only one step in the chess game. I’m very much happy that they tabled it and that they continue to allow public comment until they make their decision.”

At the meeting, which lasted for several hours, officials with Rocky Mountain Power conducted a presentation lasting more than two hours that included comments from a property valuation expert and an electric and magnetic fields expert, who claimed the lines aren’t anticipated to cause adverse health affects.

Public comments were also received at the meeting, many of which included concerns about public safety issues, fire risks, visual blight, potential health impacts, reduced property values and impacts to water sources.

Pratt brought signatures from 4,000 Tooele County residents opposing the southeast bench route to the meeting.

“This south bench route that we’re talking about is the greatest impact,” he said. “The choice Rocky Mountain Power has chosen is the greatest impact to our valley.”

Tooele City Council Chairman Scott Wardle asked planning commissioners to table the conditional use permit.

“We ask you to do the right thing,” Wardle said. “We ask you to lead this community. There is no reason to rush to judgment tonight. There are too many questions that simply have not been answered.”

Tooele City Mayor Patrick Dunlavy praised those who have been actively involved in getting information about the project.

“I’ve never seen, in my 43 years of public service, a community, a county, a citizens group come together like this county and this citizens group and this valley has on this issue,” Dunlavy said, adding city officials have never been against added power and understand its importance.

Jim Webber, a radiologist at Mountain West Medical Center, said, “I’m not opposed to increased power, and we do need it. We just don’t need it where they’re proposing to put it.”

Sarah Miley: swest@tooeletranscript.com

comments (2)
« lazylt wrote on Friday, Feb 12 at 08:41 AM »
I am shocked that this sounding board here at the transcript is not buzzing with comments about Rocky Mountain Powers proposed High Voltage powerlines. There was 2 articles on the same day concerning power. 1 stated that we need more in order to develop, and the other stating that there is a project underway maybe, maybe bring some. If RMP has their way there will be a 1 mile, that's right 1 mile wide corridor with power-lines from Mona Utah through the town of Rush Valley, to the Limber Substation in the Tooele Valley. Then the Tooele Valley will be in-circled with 2 High voltage lines, one heading east through the south side of Tooele, and the other going north and the east around Grantsville and then to Salt Lake. The proposed 2 500kV lines from Mona can carry 1500 megawatts of power, the 345kV lines to Salt Lake can carry 750 megawatts per circuit and are double circuit lines(1500 megawatts each). We need as citizens to speak up and speak out to support all of the leaders and groups of this County who have tried to tell RMP that this project is not acceptable as is for our county. If we ALL don't speak up, we will have these power-lines forever. They will never remove them. Stand-up, show your support and concern. Glenn
« Rocktopper wrote on Friday, Feb 05 at 07:42 AM »
I am heartened that the county commission did not roll over and play dead for RMP. My experience with RMP and Solar Power leaves a bad taste in my mouth that will never be cleansed.

RMP has displayed an attitude of "we are going to do whatever we want to do" and the residents of the county had better fall in line with our views.

I don't want Tooele County to roll over and play dead for this company, whose only interest is profits, while putting on a face of benevolent heroes who are saving us from ourselves.

There are other routes through the county that are more appropiate and will not scar us forever.

May the County Commision have the spine to stand up to Rocky Mountain Power and deny them the route they want, and give them the route we the people of Tooele County will accept.
report abuse...

Comments will be posted after review. Please allow up to 24 hours for comment approval.

Readers are solely responsible for the content of the comments they post here. Comments do not necessarily reflect the opinion or approval of the Tooele Transcript-Bulletin. Abusive comments and users are subject to rejection or removal without notification.

We will reject and remove comments that contain any of the following: Potentially libelous statements; personal attacks, insults or threats; profanity or obscene references; copyrighted articles or information used without permission; promotional messages of a commercial nature; links to other Web sites; comments unrelated to the topic of the article.

By posting a comment, you are agreeing to abide by these guidelines. Violation of these guidelines may result in a user being barred from posting on the Web site.